Download PDF

Clinical Neurophysiology

Publication date: 2024-07-01
Volume: 163 Pages: 226 - 235
Publisher: Elsevier

Author:

Ansari, Amir
Pillay, Kirubin ; Arasteh, Emad ; Dereymaeker, Anneleen ; Mellado, Gabriela Schmidt ; Jansen, Katrien ; Winkler, Anderson M ; Naulaers, Gunnar ; Bhatt, Aomesh ; Van Huffel, Sabine ; Hartley, Caroline ; De Vos, Maarten ; Slater, Rebeccah ; Baxter, Luke

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Clinical Neurology, Neurosciences, Neurosciences & Neurology, Infant, Deep learning, Convolutional neural network, Electroencephalography, Bayley Scale, Brain age gap, PRETERM, EEG, MATURATION, SLEEP, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Female, Brain, Child Development, Deep Learning, Infant, Premature, Rest, 09 Engineering, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Neurology & Neurosurgery, 3209 Neurosciences

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates' biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates' brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements. METHODS: We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites. RESULTS: In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model's brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: The magnitude of neonates' brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.