Download PDF (external access)

The Lancet

Publication date: 2011-01-22
Volume: 377 Pages: 321 - 331
Publisher: The Lancet Publishing Group

Author:

van de Velde, CJ
Rea, D ; Seynaeve, C ; Putter, H ; Hasenburg, A ; Vannetzel, JM ; Paridaens, Robert ; Markopoulos, C ; Hozumi, Y ; Hille, ET ; Kieback, DG ; Asmar, L ; Smeets, J ; Nortier, JW ; Hadji, P ; Bartlett, JM ; Jones, SE

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, 1ST-LINE THERAPY, LETROZOLE, EXPRESSION, ESTROGEN, UPDATE, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Androstadienes, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Breast Neoplasms, Disease-Free Survival, Early Diagnosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postmenopause, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Tamoxifen, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 42 Health sciences

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen when given as an initial adjuvant treatment or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen to postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We therefore compared the long-term effects of exemestane monotherapy with sequential treatment (tamoxifen followed by exemestane). METHODS: The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) phase 3 trial was conducted in hospitals in nine countries. Postmenopausal women (median age 64 years, range 35-96) with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to open-label exemestane (25 mg once a day, orally) alone or following tamoxifen (20 mg once a day, orally) for 5 years. Randomisation was by use of a computer-generated random permuted block method. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. Main analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00279448, NCT00032136, and NCT00036270; NTR 267; Ethics Commission Trial27/2001; and UMIN, C000000057. FINDINGS: 9779 patients were assigned to sequential treatment (n=4875) or exemestane alone (n=4904), and 4868 and 4898 were analysed by intention to treat, respectively. 4154 (85%) patients in the sequential group and 4186 (86%) in the exemestane alone group were disease free at 5 years (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·88-1·08; p=0·60). In the safety analysis, sequential treatment was associated with a higher incidence of gynaecological symptoms (942 [20%] of 4814 vs 523 [11%] of 4852), venous thrombosis (99 [2%] vs 47 [1%]), and endometrial abnormalities (191 [4%] vs 19 [<1%]) than was exemestane alone. Musculoskeletal adverse events (2448 [50%] vs 2133 [44%]), hypertension (303 [6%] vs 219 [5%]), and hyperlipidaemia (230 [5%] vs 136 [3%]) were reported more frequently with exemestane alone. INTERPRETATION: Treatment regimens of exemestane alone or after tamoxifen might be judged to be appropriate options for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer.