Download PDF

Targeted Oncology

Publication date: 2023-03-01
Volume: 18 Pages: 181 - 193
Publisher: Springer (part of Springer Nature)

Author:

Harding, James JJ
Jungels, Christiane ; Machiels, Jean-Pascal ; Smith, David CC ; Walker, Chris ; Ji, Tao ; Jiang, Ping ; Li, Xin ; Asatiani, Ekaterine ; Van Cutsem, Eric ; Abou-Alfa, Ghassan KK

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Oncology, BILE-ACID SYNTHESIS, HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS, FGFR4, IDENTIFICATION, EXPRESSION, SUPPRESSION, CASCADE, POTENT, SIGNAL, FXR, Female, Humans, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4, Neoplasms, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Liver Neoplasms, Diarrhea, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bile Acids and Salts, 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-4/FGF19 pathway dysregulation is implicated in hepatobiliary and other solid tumors. INCB062079, an oral, selective, FGFR4 inhibitor, inhibits growth in FGF19/FGFR4-driven liver cancer models. METHODS: This was a two-part, phase I study (NCT03144661) in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), while secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (plasma FGF19; bile acid salts/7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one [C4] levels), and preliminary efficacy. In Part 1, patients received INCB062079 starting at 10 mg once daily, with 3 + 3 dose escalation. Part 2 (dose expansion) was not conducted because of study termination. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated (hepatobiliary, n = 11; ovarian, n = 9; other, n = 3). Among six patients receiving 15 mg twice daily, two patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 transaminitis). Both had high pretreatment C4 concentrations, prompting a protocol amendment requiring pretreatment C4 concentrations < 40.9 ng/mL and concomitant prophylactic bile acid sequestrant treatment. No additional DLTs were reported at 10 and 15 mg twice daily; higher doses were not assessed. The most common toxicity was diarrhea (60.9%). INCB062079 exposure was dose-proportional; FGF19 and bile acid/C4 concentrations increased with exposure. One partial response was achieved (15 mg twice daily; ovarian cancer; FGF/FGFR status unknown; duration of response, 7.5 months); two patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: With C4 cut-off and prophylactic bile acid sequestrant implementation, INCB062079 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and evidence of target inhibition. In view of the rarity of FGF19/FGFR4 alterations and slow patient accrual, the study was terminated before establishing an MTD.