Download PDF

Journal Of Clinical Oncology

Publication date: 2023-04-10
Volume: 41 Pages: 2007 -
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology

Author:

Tempero, Margaret A
Pelzer, Uwe ; O'Reilly, Eileen M ; Winter, Jordan ; Oh, Do-Youn ; Li, Chung-Pin ; Tortora, Giampaolo ; Chang, Heung-Moon ; Lopez, Charles D ; Bekaii-Saab, Tanios ; Ko, Andrew H ; Santoro, Armando ; Park, Joon Oh ; Noel, Marcus S ; Frassineti, Giovanni Luca ; Shan, Yan-Shen ; Dean, Andrew ; Riess, Hanno ; Van Cutsem, Eric ; Berlin, Jordan ; Philip, Philip ; Moore, Malcolm ; Goldstein, David ; Tabernero, Josep ; Li, Mingyu ; Ferrara, Stefano ; Le Bruchec, Yvan ; Zhang, George ; Lu, Brian ; Biankin, Andrew V ; Reni, Michele

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Oncology, CANCER, CHEMOTHERAPY, CAPECITABINE, MULTICENTER, Humans, Gemcitabine, Deoxycytidine, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Albumins, Paclitaxel, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, APACT Investigators, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis

Abstract:

PURPOSE: This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430). METHODS: We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 (nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 (nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent (nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION: The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.