Author:

Keywords:

Meaningfulness, Citizenship, Volunteers, Restorative Justice, Arts & Humanities, History & Philosophy Of Science, History & Philosophy of Science, Civic meaningfulness, Existential model of meaningfulness, Plurality, 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields, Science Studies, 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields, 5003 Philosophy

Abstract:

© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. This final reply responds to Honohan’s invitation to articulate the Arendtian tone of the key-note paper. It spells out the philosophical intuition that the political life of citizens, at least potentially, is capable of making visible what makes human life worthwhile and fully meaningful, and the philosophical curiosity to see whether traces of this deep political awareness can be retrieved in dialogues with volunteers. In response to Dekker’s critical doubts, this final reply clarifies the central stakes of Claes’s paper. The core argument was not to show that the biographical model of meaningfulness is the prevailing approach of meaning in/of volunteering, but to assess the potentials and limits of the model’s interpretive power. Moreover, the paper argues for an alternative, existential model of meaningfulness. This approach refers to deep experiences of meaning that emerge from the practice of volunteering and that shift into powerful political experiences of hope, and a lived sense of equality.