Download PDF

New England Journal Of Medicine

Publication date: 2021-02-25
Volume: 384 Pages: 705 - 716
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society

Author:

Munshi, Nikhil C
Anderson, Larry D ; Shah, Nina ; Madduri, Deepu ; Berdeja, Jesus ; Lonial, Sagar ; Raje, Noopur ; Lin, Yi ; Siegel, David ; Oriol, Albert ; Moreau, Philippe ; Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim ; Delforge, Michel ; Cavo, Michele ; Einsele, Hermann ; Goldschmidt, Hartmut ; Weisel, Katja ; Rambaldi, Alessandro ; Reece, Donna ; Petrocca, Fabio ; Massaro, Monica ; Connarn, Jamie N ; Kaiser, Shari ; Patel, Payal ; Huang, Liping ; Campbell, Timothy B ; Hege, Kristen ; San-Miguel, Jesus

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Female, Hematologic Diseases, Humans, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Progression-Free Survival, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Recurrence, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 42 Health sciences

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, also called bb2121), a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has shown clinical activity with expected CAR T-cell toxic effects in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this phase 2 study, we sought to confirm the efficacy and safety of ide-cel in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma. Patients with disease after at least three previous regimens including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 antibody were enrolled. Patients received ide-cel target doses of 150 × 106 to 450 × 106 CAR-positive (CAR+) T cells. The primary end point was an overall response (partial response or better); a key secondary end point was a complete response or better (comprising complete and stringent complete responses). RESULTS: Of 140 patients enrolled, 128 received ide-cel. At a median follow-up of 13.3 months, 94 of 128 patients (73%) had a response, and 42 of 128 (33%) had a complete response or better. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status (<10-5 nucleated cells) was confirmed in 33 patients, representing 26% of all 128 patients who were treated and 79% of the 42 patients who had a complete response or better. The median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.6 to 11.6). Common toxic effects among the 128 treated patients included neutropenia in 117 patients (91%), anemia in 89 (70%), and thrombocytopenia in 81 (63%). Cytokine release syndrome was reported in 107 patients (84%), including 7 (5%) who had events of grade 3 or higher. Neurotoxic effects developed in 23 patients (18%) and were of grade 3 in 4 patients (3%); no neurotoxic effects higher than grade 3 occurred. Cellular kinetic analysis confirmed CAR+ T cells in 29 of 49 patients (59%) at 6 months and 4 of 11 patients (36%) at 12 months after infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Ide-cel induced responses in a majority of heavily pretreated patients with refractory and relapsed myeloma; MRD-negative status was achieved in 26% of treated patients. Almost all patients had grade 3 or 4 toxic effects, most commonly hematologic toxic effects and cytokine release syndrome. (Funded by bluebird bio and Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb company; KarMMa ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03361748.).