Journal Of The American Society Of Nephrology
Author:
Keywords:
Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Urology & Nephrology, acute allograft rejection, kidney biopsy, transplant pathology, transplant outcomes, kidney transplantation, ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION, CLASSIFICATION, CRITERIA, PROSPECTS, SURVIVAL, Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Cluster Analysis, Cohort Studies, Female, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Kidney Transplantation, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Reproducibility of Results, STADIUS--21-02, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical sciences
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, an international group of experts iteratively developed a consensus classification of kidney transplant rejection phenotypes, known as the Banff classification. Data-driven clustering of kidney transplant histologic data could simplify the complex and discretionary rules of the Banff classification, while improving the association with graft failure. METHODS: The data consisted of a training set of 3510 kidney-transplant biopsies from an observational cohort of 936 recipients. Independent validation of the results was performed on an external set of 3835 biopsies from 1989 patients. On the basis of acute histologic lesion scores and the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies, stable clustering was achieved on the basis of a consensus of 400 different clustering partitions. Additional information on kidney-transplant failure was introduced with a weighted Euclidean distance. RESULTS: Based on the proportion of ambiguous clustering, six clinically meaningful cluster phenotypes were identified. There was significant overlap with the existing Banff classification (adjusted rand index, 0.48). However, the data-driven approach eliminated intermediate and mixed phenotypes and created acute rejection clusters that are each significantly associated with graft failure. Finally, a novel visualization tool presents disease phenotypes and severity in a continuous manner, as a complement to the discrete clusters. CONCLUSIONS: A semisupervised clustering approach for the identification of clinically meaningful novel phenotypes of kidney transplant rejection has been developed and validated. The approach has the potential to offer a more quantitative evaluation of rejection subtypes and severity, especially in situations in which the current histologic categorization is ambiguous.