Download PDF Download PDF

Biology Of Blood And Marrow Transplantation

Publication date: 2019-11-01
Volume: 25 Pages: 2134 - 2142
Publisher: Elsevier

Author:

Gagelmann, Nico
Eikema, Diderik-Jan ; Koster, Linda ; Caillot, Denis ; Pioltelli, Pietro ; Lleonart, Juan Bargay ; Remenyi, Peter ; Blaise, Didier ; Schaap, Nicolaas ; Trneny, Marek ; Passweg, Jakob ; Parody Porras, Rocio ; Cahn, Jean Yves ; Musso, Maurizio ; Poire, Xavier ; Fenk, Roland ; Itala-Remes, Maija ; Pavone, Vincenzo ; Fouillard, Loic ; Maertens, Johan ; Bron, Dominique ; Pouli, Anastasia ; Schroyens, Wilfried ; Schoenland, Stefan ; Garderet, Laurent ; Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim ; Kroeger, Nicolaus

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Hematology, Immunology, Transplantation, Myeloma, Extramedullary disease, Autologous, Tandem, Allogeneic, Cytogenetics, INTERNATIONAL STAGING SYSTEM, GENETIC ABNORMALITIES, IMPACT, BORTEZOMIB, INDUCTION, CONSENSUS, SURVIVAL, THERAPY, Adult, Aged, Autografts, Chromosome Aberrations, Disease-Free Survival, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, Stem Cell Transplantation, Survival Rate, allogeneic, autologous, cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, myeloma, tandem, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology

Abstract:

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant combined with novel agents continues to be the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and high-risk cytogenetics is not yet defined. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with EMD undergoing single autologous (n = 373), tandem autologous (n = 84), or autologous-allogeneic transplant (n = 31) between 2003 and 2015. At least 1 high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n = 202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) the most frequent. More than 1 high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 54% and 29%, respectively, versus 78% and 49% for standard-risk cytogenetics (P < .001). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, OS and PFS were 70% and 43% for single autologous versus 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (P = .06 and P = .30). In multivariate analysis high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = .003), whereas tandem autologous significantly improved outcome versus single autologous transplant (HRs, .46 and .64; P = .02 and P = .03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival, but results were limited because of small population (HR, .31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with EMD and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous, whereas a tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.