Download PDF (external access)

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Publication date: 1996-03-01
Pages: 557 - 62
Publisher: Wiley

Author:

Lémann, M
Galian, A ; Rutgeerts, Paul ; Van Heuverzwijn, R ; Cortot, A ; Viteau, JM ; Elewaut, A ; Belaiche, J ; Froguel, E ; Modigliani, R

Keywords:

Adult, Aged, Aminosalicylic Acids, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Budesonide, Colitis, Ulcerative, Colonoscopy, Enema, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnenediones, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, PLASMA PREDNISOLONE LEVELS, RETENTION ENEMA, PREDNISOLONE-21-PHOSPHATE, PROCTITIS, TRIAL, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Budesonide is a new corticosteroid with high topical anti-inflammatory activity but little systemic effect. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide enema (2 mg/100 mL) and 5-ASA enema (mesalazine 1 g/100 mL) given for 4 weeks in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients were studied in a multicentre single-blind randomized group-comparative trial. The primary efficacy variables were endoscopy and histopathology scores obtained at 0, 2 and 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms were the secondary efficacy variables. Haematology, chemistry and adverse events were the safety variables. RESULTS: Budesonide and 5-ASA enemas both resulted in a significant improvement in endoscopy and histopathology scores but no difference could be demonstrated between the two treatment groups. There was also a significant improvement of symptoms (number of bowel movements per day, quality of stools, presence of blood and mucus, and state of well-being) within both groups but no difference between the two treatment groups. The clinical remission rate at 4 weeks was, however, 38% for patients treated with budesonide enema but 60% for those treated with 5-ASA enema (P = 0.03). No adverse events attributed to the study drugs were recorded in either of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide enema 2 mg/100 mL appears to be as efficient and well-tolerated as 5-ASA enema in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.