Download PDF

International Journal of Intercultural Relations

Publication date: 2011-01-01
Volume: 35 Pages: 334 - 335
Publisher: Transaction Periodicals Consortium

Author:

Van Acker, Kaat
Vanbeselaere, Norbert

Keywords:

intergroup contact, acculturation expectations, acculturation perceptions, outgroup affect, Social Sciences, Psychology, Social, Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary, Sociology, Psychology, Social Sciences - Other Topics, Intergroup contact, Acculturation expectations, Acculturation perceptions, Outgroup affect, ATTITUDES, IMMIGRANTS, PREJUDICE, NETHERLANDS, INTEGRATION, PSYCHOLOGY, MINORITY, CONSEQUENCES, ORIENTATIONS, ASSIMILATION, 1608 Sociology, 1701 Psychology, Social Psychology, 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour, 4404 Development studies, 4702 Cultural studies

Abstract:

The present paper explores Flemish majority members’ expectations concerning the acculturation of Turkish minorities. We studied two kinds of antecedents: majority members’ perceptions of Turkish minorities’ acculturation behavior and their experiences of intergroup contact. The possible mediating role of outgroup affect was also investigated. 247 Flemish high school students completed a survey. Data were analyzed using path analyses. Results show that positive contact experiences and perceiving that Turkish immigrants make efforts to engage in contact with the host group and/or to adopt the host culture are associated with less negative affective reactions towards Turkish migrants. Perceiving that Turkish immigrants maintain their heritage culture is associated with more negative affective reactions. Our results further revealed that increased negative affective reactions are associated with less support for culture maintenance and for contact with the host group but with a higher demand for host culture adoption. The present results also show that expectations of contact engagement and expectations of host culture adoption cannot be considered as equivalent. This implies that results from studies using Berry’s conceptualization of acculturation expectations (Berry, 2001) and results from studies using Bourhis’ conceptualization of acculturation expectations (Bourhis, Moïse, Perreault and Senécal, 1997) are not directly comparable. Our data also clearly disconfirm the orthogonal structure of the fourfold acculturation model for majority members’ acculturation expectations, suggesting that relying on the specific dimensions defining acculturation expectations may constitute a more valid approach to understand ongoing acculturation processes.