Author:

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Archaeology, Ethnoarchaeology, ethnographic analogy, direct historical method, ethnographic comparison, history of ethnoarchaeology, archaeological theory, archaeological inference, processual ethnoarchaeology, DIRECT HISTORICAL APPROACH, ARCHAEOLOGY, POTTERY, 1601 Anthropology, 2101 Archaeology, 4301 Archaeology, 4401 Anthropology

Abstract:

From a genealogical perspective, this article explores the foundations of ethnoarchaeological research in the context of European colonialism. It investigates methodologies that utilize ethnographic information for reconstructing historical contexts, focusing first on early comparisons during colonial encounters. These comparisons significantly shaped the amalgamation of ethnographic data into archaeology and the formulation of interpretive strategies, encompassing the direct historical method and ethnographic analogy to decipher societies via material evidence using ethnographies of non-western societies. Despite the initial prevalence of ethnographic analogy in the 1950s, ethnoarchaeology progressed by integrating novel data collection techniques into broader scientific discussions. This article critically challenges established historiographical narratives within ethnoarchaeology, asserting that aspects of ethnographic analogy and ethnoarchaeological methodology did not solely emerge as processual innovations in the 1950s, but rather their roots trace back to earlier archaeologists and ethnographers and previous colonial scholars.