Author:

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Acoustics, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging, ENDOMETRIAL-MYOMETRIAL JUNCTION, UTERUS SONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT, MENSTRUAL-CYCLE, 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND, ULTRASTRUCTURAL FEATURES, VAGINAL SONOGRAPHY, IMAGING FEATURES, ENDOVAGINAL US, HEALTHY WOMEN, BASIC PHYSICS, Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Adenomyosis, Uterus, Myometrium, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Endometriosis, adenomyosis, histology, junctional zone, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, STG/20/007#55806583, C24M/21/039#56284823, MUSA, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3215 Reproductive medicine

Abstract:

The uterine junctional zone is the subendometrial area in the myometrium that contributes to peristalsis and aids in spermatozoa and blastocyst transport. Alterations in the appearance of the junctional zone on transvaginal sonography (TVS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with adenomyosis. The lack of standardization of description of its appearance and ill-defined boundaries on both histology and imaging hamper understanding of the junctional zone and limit its role in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The objectives of this review were to investigate the accordance in definition of the junctional zone across different diagnostic approaches and to examine how imaging findings can be linked to histological findings in the context of diagnosis of adenomyosis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted of articles describing the appearance on imaging and the histological structure of the uterine junctional zone. Our review suggests that the junctional zone is distinguished from the middle and outer myometrium by gradual changes in smooth-muscle cell density, extracellular space, connective tissue, water content and vascular properties. However, while the signal intensity from the junctional zone to the middle myometrium changes abruptly on MRI, the histopathological changes are gradual and its border may be difficult or impossible to distinguish on two-dimensional TVS. Moreover, the thickness of the junctional zone measured on MRI is larger than that measured on TVS. Thus, these two imaging modalities reflect this zone differently. Although a thickened junctional zone is often used to diagnose adenomyosis on MRI, the presence of adenomyosis can be described more accurately as interruptions of the junctional zone by endometrial tissue, which leads to direct signs on imaging such as subendometrial lines and buds on two- and three-dimensional TVS or bright foci on MRI. The histopathological criteria for diagnosis are based on enlargement of the uterus with severe adenomyosis, and might not reflect its early stages. Clinicians should be aware that findings on MRI cannot be extrapolated readily to ultrasound. An understanding of this is necessary when investigating the uterine junctional zone as a functional unit and the association between visualization of direct features of adenomyosis in the junctional zone and clinical symptoms. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.