Author:

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medical Laboratory Technology, Medicine, Research & Experimental, Pathology, Research & Experimental Medicine, REQUEST FORMS, ERRORS, MEDICINE, Biomarkers, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Europe, Humans, Laboratories, Hospital, Lung Neoplasms, Medical Errors, Pathology, Molecular, Patient Safety, Quality Assurance, Health Care, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical sciences

Abstract:

CONTEXT.—: Errors in laboratory medicine could compromise patient safety. Good laboratory practice includes identifying and managing nonconformities in the total test process. Varying error percentages have been described in other fields but are lacking for molecular oncology. OBJECTIVES.—: To gain insight into incident causes and frequency in the total test process from 8 European institutes routinely performing biomarker tests in non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer. DESIGN.—: All incidents documented in 2018 were collected from all hospital services for pre-preanalytical entries before the biomarker test, as well as specific incidents for biomarker tests. RESULTS.—: There were 5185 incidents collected, of which 4363 (84.1%) occurred in the pre-preanalytical phase (all hospital services), 2796 of 4363 (64.1%) related to missing or incorrect request form information. From the other 822 specific incidents, 166 (20.2%) were recorded in the preanalytical phase, 275 (33.5%) in the analytical phase, and 194 (23.6%) in the postanalytical phase, mainly due to incorrect report content. Only 47 of 822 (5.7%) incidents were recorded in the post-postanalytical phase, and 123 (15.0%) in the complete total test process. For 17 of 822 (2.1%) incidents the time point was unknown. Pre-preanalytical incidents were resolved sooner than incidents on the complete process (mean 6 versus 60 days). For 1215 of 5168 (23.5%) incidents with known causes a specific action was undertaken besides documenting them, not limited to accredited institutes. CONCLUSIONS.—: There was a large variety in the number and extent of documented incidents. Correct and complete information on the request forms and final reports are highly error prone and require additional focus.