Author:

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Social Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Oncology, Social Sciences, Biomedical, Biomedical Social Sciences, Pain, Breast neoplasms, Pain science education, Models, biopsychosocial, LOW-BACK-PAIN, NEUROPATHIC PAIN, SURVIVORS PREVALENCE, HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS, MANAGEMENT, PATIENT, BARRIERS, QUALITY, UPDATE, CARE, Models, biopsychosocial, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Professional Practice Gaps, Cancer Survivors, Pain Management, 12R1719N#54765167, 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis

Abstract:

This paper discusses the growing problem of persisting pain after successful treatment of breast cancer and presents recommendations for improving pain-related outcomes for this group. We discuss the dominant treatment approach for persisting pain post-breast cancer treatment and draw contrasts with contemporary treatment approaches to persistent pain in non-cancer-related populations. We discuss modern application of the biopsychosocial model of pain and the notion of variable sensitivity within the pain system, moment by moment and over time. We present the implications of increasing sensitivity over time for treatment selection and implementation. By drawing on transformative changes in treatment approaches to persistent non-cancer-related pain, we describe the potentially powerful role that an intervention called pain science education, which is now recommended in clinical guidelines for musculoskeletal pain, may play in improving pain and disability outcomes after successful breast cancer treatment. Finally, we present several research recommendations that centre around adaptation of the content and delivery models of contemporary pain science education, to the post-breast cancer context.