This item still needs to be validated !
Title: Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome: implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis
Authors: Buiting, K ×
Dittrich, B
Gross, S
Lich, C
Färber, C
Buchholz, T
Smith, E
Reis, A
Bürger, J
Nöthen, M M
Barth-Witte, U
Janssen, B
Abeliovich, D
Lerer, I
van den Ouweland, A M
Halley, D J
Schrander-Stumpel, C
Smeets, H
Meinecke, P
Malcolm, S
Gardner, A
Lalande, M
Nicholls, R D
Friend, K
Schulze, A
Matthijs, Gert
Kokkonen, H
Hilbert, P
Van Maldergem, L
Glover, G
Carbonell, P
Willems, P
Gillessen-Kaesbach, G
Horsthemke, B #
Issue Date: Aug-1998
Series Title: American Journal of Human Genetics vol:63 issue:1 pages:170-80
Abstract: The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and the Angelman syndrome (AS) are caused by the loss of function of imprinted genes in proximal 15q. In approximately 2%-4% of patients, this loss of function is due to an imprinting defect. In some cases, the imprinting defect is the result of a parental imprint-switch failure caused by a microdeletion of the imprinting center (IC). Here we describe the molecular analysis of 13 PWS patients and 17 AS patients who have an imprinting defect but no IC deletion. Heteroduplex and partial sequence analysis did not reveal any point mutations of the known IC elements, either. Interestingly, all of these patients represent sporadic cases, and some share the paternal (PWS) or the maternal (AS) 15q11-q13 haplotype with an unaffected sib. In each of five PWS patients informative for the grandparental origin of the incorrectly imprinted chromosome region and four cases described elsewhere, the maternally imprinted paternal chromosome region was inherited from the paternal grandmother. This suggests that the grandmaternal imprint was not erased in the father's germ line. In seven informative AS patients reported here and in three previously reported patients, the paternally imprinted maternal chromosome region was inherited from either the maternal grandfather or the maternal grandmother. The latter finding is not compatible with an imprint-switch failure, but it suggests that a paternal imprint developed either in the maternal germ line or postzygotically. We conclude (1) that the incorrect imprint in non-IC-deletion cases is the result of a spontaneous prezygotic or postzygotic error, (2) that these cases have a low recurrence risk, and (3) that the paternal imprint may be the default imprint.
ISSN: 0002-9297
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Clinical Genetics Section (-)
Department of Human Genetics - miscellaneous
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science