This item still needs to be validated !
Title: In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires
Authors: Verstrynge, Astrid ×
Van Humbeeck, Jan
Willems, Guy #
Issue Date: Oct-2006
Publisher: Mosby, Inc.
Series Title: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics vol:130 issue:4 pages:460-470
Abstract: Introduction: The exact composition and material properties of the metal alloys used in orthodontics are usually not identified by or even available from manufacturers. This makes meaningful comparisons between wires impossible and is unacceptable with regard to biocompatibility issues. The aim of this study was to investigate the material characteristics of contemporary stainless steel (SS) and beta-titanium (beta-Ti) wires, also known as titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA), for comparison. Methods: Twenty-two different SS and beta-Ti wires, preferably straight wires sized 0.43 X 0.64 mm, (0.017 x 0.025 in) were tested blindly for wire dimensions, chemical compositions, bending and tensile properties, and surface characteristics. Results: Four chemical compositions were found for the beta-Ti wires: titanium-11.5, molybdenum-6, zirconium-4.5 tin; titanium-3, aluminum-8, vanadium-6, chromium-4, molybdenum-4, zirconium; titanium-6, aluminum-4, vanadium, and titanium-45 niobium. The SS wires were of AISI type 304 or the nickel-free variant BioDur 108. All beta-Ti wires showed high surface roughness values. TMA 02 significantly had the highest E-modulus, TMA 02 and TMA 11 had the highest 0.2% yield strength, TMA 02 had the highest hardness, and TMA 12 was the most ductile wire of the beta-Ti wires. All SS wires showed high 0.2% yield strength, SS 10 significantly had the lowest E-modulus and was the most ductile wire, and SS 08 significantly showed the lowest hardness values of all SS wires. Conclusions: Significant differences were found between SS and beta-Ti wires, but there was little or no difference between the mechanical and physical characteristics tested in each subgroup. However, the morphological analysis clearly demonstrated that the finishing phase (annealing, polishing) of the wires' production process lacks the quality one would expect with regard to good mechanical properties and biocompatibility issues. Accurate specifications are urgently needed concerning the quality of orthodontic wires on the market.
ISSN: 0889-5406
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Clinical Residents Dentistry
Physical Metallurgy and Materials Engineering Section (-)
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
pub03677.pdfMain article Published 1383KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
2006_AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop_Verstrynge_Evaluation of the characteristics of stainless steel and wires.pdf Published 1383KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science