Author:

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Business, Management, Business & Economics, ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES, EDITORS, LEADERSHIP, CONFLICT, PROGRESS, ADVANCE, FIELD, TIME, Theory, 1503 Business and Management, 1505 Marketing, Business & Management, 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour

Abstract:

Lewin’s famous dictum is that “there’s nothing so practical as a good theory,” yet there is growing concern that management theory is not very useful or usable. Many scholars seek to fix the growing disconnect between theory and managerial realities, as well as the overabundance of weak and untested theory. Our concern is that all this discussion focuses on improving unit theory, which frames empirical work on specific aspects of a phenomenon, rather than programmatic theory, which orients scholars and practitioners toward what the unit theories collectively support as settled science. While programmatic theory must be comprised of solid unit theories, the processes that improve programmatic theory are different from and can be undermined by those that improve unit theory. Our contribution, therefore, is a model for how unit theory becomes programmatic theory that demonstrates how and why programmatic theory needs to drive that process. We conclude by using our model to show why the current suggestions for fixing the crisis of theory are not only insufficient but even draw away from the development of programmatic theory.