Teblick, Arno; Philipse, Ester; Vleut, Rowena; Massart, Annick; Couttenye, Marie M; Bracke, Bart; Hartman, Vera; Chapelle, Thiery; Roeyen, Geert; Ysebaert, Dirk K; Abramowicz, Daniel; Hellemans, Rachel

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.05.018

" Does Perioperative Patient Perfusion Obviate the Need for Kidney Machine Perfusion?" A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Receiving a Kidney From "Donation After Circulatory Death" Donors

Author:

Teblick, Arno

Philipse, Ester ; Vleut, Rowena ; Massart, Annick ; Couttenye, Marie M ; Bracke, Bart ; Hartman, Vera ; Chapelle, Thiery ; Roeyen, Geert ; Ysebaert, Dirk K ; Abramowicz, Daniel ; Hellemans, Rachel

Keywords:

COST-EFFECTIVENESS, DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION, Immunology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, PRESERVATION, RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION, Science & Technology, Surgery, Transplantation, Adult, Delayed Graft Function, Female, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Kidney Transplantation, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Perfusion, Retrospective Studies, Saline Solution, Tissue Donors, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3204 Immunology

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a clinically relevant problem in the post-transplant period, especially in patients with a renal graft from a "donation after cardiac death" (DCD) donor. Controversy exists around the optimal perioperative fluid therapy in such patients. These patients may benefit from a perioperative saline loading fluid protocol, which may reduce the risk of DGF. METHODS: We compared 2 cohorts of patients who underwent a renal transplantation with a graft from a DCD donor. From January 2003 until December 2012, patients (N = 46) were hemodynamically managed at the discretion of the care-giving physician, without a preoperative fluid administration protocol (first study period). From January 2015 until March 2019 (N = 26), patients received saline loading before, during, and after kidney transplantation according to a well-defined saline loading fluid protocol (second study period). The relationship between the use of this perioperative fluid protocol and DGF was analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: DGF occurred in 11 of 46 (24%) patients in the first study period and in 1 of 26 (4%) in the second study period (P < .05). In a multivariable model, correcting for cold ischemia time and Kidney Donor Risk Index, the use of a saline loading fluid protocol in the perioperative phase was nearly significantly associated with a decrease in DGF (P = .07). CONCLUSION: In our DCD transplant population, DGF rates were low. Our data further strongly suggest that implementation of a perioperative saline loading fluid protocol was independently associated with a lower risk of DGF.