Download PDF

Clinical Kidney Journal

Publication date: 2018-10-01
Volume: 11 Pages: 623 - 654
Publisher: Oxford University Press

Author:

De Moor, Bart
Vanwalleghem, Johan F ; Swennen, Quirine ; Stas, Koen J ; Meijers, Bjorn KI

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Urology & Nephrology, protein stimulation test, renal functional reserve, renal functional response, renal stimulation test, renal stress test, GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE, AMINO-ACID INFUSION, ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY, PROTEIN LOAD, STRESS TEST, INDUCED HYPERFILTRATION, CREATININE CLEARANCE, RESERVE CAPACITY, DIETARY-PROTEIN, GROWTH-HORMONE, HEALTHY-SUBJECTS, 3202 Clinical sciences

Abstract:

Renal stimulation tests document the dynamic response of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a single or a combination of stimuli, such as an intravenous infusion of dopamine or amino acids or an oral protein meal. The increment of the GFR above the unstimulated state has formerly been called the renal functional reserve (RFR). Although the concept of a renal reserve capacity has not withstood scientific scrutiny, the literature documenting renal stimulation merits renewed interest. An absent or a blunted response of the GFR after a stimulus indicates lost or diseased nephrons. This information is valuable in preventing, diagnosing and prognosticating acute kidney injury and pregnancy-related renal events as well as chronic kidney disease. However, before renal function testing is universally practiced, some shortcomings must be addressed. First, a common nomenclature should be decided upon. The expression of RFR should be replaced by renal functional response. Second, a simple protocol must be developed and propagated. Third, we suggest designing prospective studies linking a defective stimulatory response to emergence of renal injury biomarkers, to histological or morphological renal abnormalities and to adverse renal outcomes in different renal syndromes.