Download PDF

Bmc Public Health

Publication date: 2018-11-22
Volume: 18 Pages: 1277 - 1298
Publisher: BioMed Central

Author:

Thapa, Subash
Hannes, Karin ; Cargo, Margaret ; Buve, Anne ; Peters, Sanne ; Dauphin, Stephanie ; Matheï, Cat

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Context-mechanism-outcome configurations, HIV test uptake, Low- and middle-income countries, Realist review, And stigma reduction interventions, AIDS-RELATED STIGMA, HIV/AIDS STIGMA, INTERVENTION STRATEGIES, COMBINATION PREVENTION, CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK, PROJECT ACCEPT, MEN, IMPACT, CARE, CAPE, Developing Countries, HIV Infections, Humans, Mass Screening, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Social Stigma, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Public Health, 4202 Epidemiology, 4203 Health services and systems, 4206 Public health

Abstract:

Background: This realist review was conducted to understand how stigma is reduced in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: A systematic search of eight databases resulted in 34 articles considered for synthesis. Data synthesis was guided by a preliminary programme theory and included coding the meaning units to develop themes or intervention pathways that corresponded to context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Results: We found that the interventions produced an effect through two pathways: (a) knowledge leads to changes in stigmatizing attitudes and increases in HIV test uptake and (b) knowledge and attitudes lead to changes in stigmatizing behaviours and lead to HIV test uptake. We also found one competing pathway that illustrated the direct impact of knowledge on HIV test uptake without changing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviour. The identified pathways were found to be influenced by some structural factors (e.g., anti-homosexuality laws, country- specific HIV testing programmes and policies), community factors (e.g., traditional beliefs and practices, sexual taboos and prevalence of intimate partner violence) and target-population characteristics (e.g., age, income and urban-rural residence). Conclusions: The pathways and underlying mechanisms support the adaptation of intervention strategies in terms of social context and the target population in LMICs.