Download PDF

Bmj Open

Publication date: 2018-06-01
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

Author:

Hoffman, Mariana
Van Hollebeke, Marine ; Clerckx, Beatrix ; Muller, Johannes ; Louvaris, Zafeiris ; Gosselink, Rik ; Hermans, Greet ; Langer, Daniel

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT, CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, CRITICAL ILLNESS, RESPIRATORY MUSCLES, DIAPHRAGM WEAKNESS, RECOMMENDATIONS, PHYSIOTHERAPY, DYSFUNCTION, MEDICINE, intensive care units, respiratory muscle training, ventilator weaning, Belgium, Breathing Exercises, Double-Blind Method, Dyspnea, Humans, Inhalation, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Patient Compliance, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Respiratory Muscles, Respiratory Therapy, Ventilator Weaning, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 42 Health sciences, 52 Psychology

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory muscle dysfunction has been associated with failure to wean from mechanical ventilation. It has therefore been hypothesised that these patients might benefit from inspiratory muscle training (IMT). Evidence, however, is thus far limited to data from small, single-centre studies with heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, training modalities and outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel IMT method on weaning outcomes in selected patients with weaning difficulties. METHODS: This study is designed as a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients with weaning difficulties will be randomly allocated into either an IMT group (intervention) or a sham-IMT group (control). Ninetypatients (45 in each group) will be needed to detect a 28% difference in the proportion of weaning success between groups (estimated difference in primary outcome based on previous studies) with a risk for type I error (α) of 5% and statistical power (1-β) of 80%. Patients will perform four sets of 6-10 breaths daily against an external load using a tapered flow resistive loading device (POWERbreathe KH2, HaB International, UK). Training intensity in the intervention group will be adjusted to the highest tolerable load. The control group will train against a low resistance that will not be modified during the training period. Training will becontinued until patients are successfully weaned or for a maximum duration of 28 days. Pulmonary and respiratory muscle function, weaning duration, duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days and length of stay in the intensive care unit will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. Χ2 tests and analysis of covariance with adjustments for baseline values of respective outcomesas covariates will be used to compare results after the intervention period between groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethical committee (Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven protocol ID: S60516). Results from this randomised controlled trial will be presented at scientific meetings as abstracts for poster or oral presentations and published in peerreviewed journals. TRIAL STATUS: Enrolment into the study have started in August 2017. Data collection and data analysis are expected to be completed in September 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03240263.