Title: Elimination marking is less disadvantageous for risk-averse students than negative marking: experimental and theoretical analysis using prospect theory
Authors: De Laet, Tinne
Vanderoost, Jef
Callens, Riet
Vandewalle, Joos
Issue Date: 2014
Host Document: Proceedings of the 2014 EAPRIL conference
Conference: EAPRIL Conference edition:3 location:Nicosia, Cyprus date:25-28 Novermber 2014
Abstract: The aim of the research is to investigate if "elimination testing" is less disadvantageous for risk-averse students than the widely used negative marking. In order to answer the research questions a double approach was used. Firstly we used an experimental setting and introduced elimination testing in a first year Engineering Science bachelor “Electrical circuits” using a multiple choice exam. Secondly, a theoretical analysis using the theory of “decision making under uncertainty” was used to compare different multiple choice methods and their impact on risk-averse students.
The results of the research are that elimination testing is suited for use in multiple choice exams in a technical first year Engineering Science Bachelor course. Students prefer, despite the extra effort needed to complete the exam, elimination testing over negative. Both from the theoretical analysis and from the survey, elimination testing showed to be less advantageous than negative marking for risk-averse students
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IMa
Appears in Collections:ESAT - STADIUS, Stadius Centre for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics
Tutorial services, Faculty of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
eliminationtesting.pdfpresentation at conference Published 3611KbAdobe PDFView/Open

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.