Title: Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts
Authors: Obersteiner, Andreas ×
Van Hoof, Jo
Verschaffel, Lieven
Van Dooren, Wim #
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Series Title: British Journal of Psychology vol:107 issue:3 pages:537-555
Abstract: Many learners have difficulties with rational number tasks because they persistently rely on their natural number knowledge, which is not always applicable. Studies show that such a natural number bias can mislead not only children but also educated adults. It is still unclear whether and under what conditions mathematical expertise enables people to be completely unaffected by such a bias on tasks in which people with less expertise are clearly biased. We compared the performance of eighth-grade students and expert mathematicians on the same set of algebraic expression problems that addressed the
effect of arithmetic operations (multiplication and division). Using accuracy and response time measures, we found clear evidence for a natural number bias in students but no traces of a bias in experts. The data suggested that whereas students based their answers on their intuitions about natural numbers, expert mathematicians relied on their skilled intuitions about algebraic expressions. We conclude that it is possible for experts to be unaffected by the natural number bias on rational number tasks when they use strategies that do not involve natural numbers.
ISSN: 0007-1269
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Instructional Psychology and Technology
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Obersteiner2015e_BJP.pdf Published 627KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science