Author:

Keywords:

immigration, Emotional and behavioral problems, International comparison, Immigrant generation, gender, Social Sciences, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Psychology, Developmental, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Psychology, Immigration, Gender, SUBJECTIVE HEALTH COMPLAINTS, MENTAL-HEALTH, PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION, MOROCCAN IMMIGRANT, ACCULTURATION, CHILDREN, NETHERLANDS, ADJUSTMENT, NORWAY, PARENT, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Emigrants and Immigrants, Europe, Female, Humans, Internationality, Male, Mental Disorders, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 13 Education, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Public Health, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 42 Health sciences, 52 Psychology

Abstract:

Purpose: Although the potential consequences of immigration for adolescent problem behaviors have been addressed in many former studies, internationally comparative research is scarce. This study investigated the impact of immigration on four indicators of adolescents’ emotional and behavioral problems in 10 countries, taking into account gender and immigrant generation as moderating factors. Methods: Analyses were based on data from11-,13-, and 15-year-old adolescents participating in the Health Behavior in School-aged Children study in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the United States, and Wales (total N = 53,218). Results: Both first- and second-generation immigrant adolescents reported higher levels of physical fighting and bullying and a lower life satisfaction than native adolescents, whereas second-generation immigrant adolescents reported more psychosomatic symptoms than native adolescents. Effect sizes varied considerable for the different outcomes, and similar effects were found for first- and second generation immigrant adolescents. Differences in these indicators of emotional and behavioral problems between immigrant and native adolescents did not vary significantly with the receiving country. With two exceptions, effects of immigrant status were similar for boys and girls. Although no differences in psychosomatic symptoms were found between first-generation immigrant and native girls, first-generation immigrant boys reported less psychosomatic symptoms than native boys. Furthermore, both second-generation immigrant boys and girls reported higher levels of physical fighting than their native peers, but differences were more pronounced for boys than for girls. Conclusions: Overall, the results of this study support a risk perspective on the impact of immigration on adolescent problem behaviors.