Title: Country and gender differences in the functioning of CEFR-based can-do statements as a tool for self-assessing English proficiency
Authors: Denies, Katrijn ×
Janssen, Rianne #
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Series Title: Language Assessment Quarterly vol:13 issue:3 pages:251-276
Abstract: This study discusses the self-assessments of over 22,500 students on a set of 12 can-do statements that are taken from the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). The students’ endorsement or negation of the statements reflects their sense of self-efficacy in English reading, writing, and listening. Their self-efficacy beliefs are compared to their proficiency level as measured in the European Survey on Language Competences. As expected, four-level mixed-effects logistic regression analyses show positive correlations between proficiency and the probability of endorsing the can-do statements. However, patterns in this relationship are influenced by the students’ gender and country. As such, the study shows how far the understanding of 15-year-olds’ own skills can vary across countries and between boys and girls, even when the skill descriptions that the students are offered rely on the highly concrete “common language” that is provided by the CEFR.
ISSN: 1543-4303
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
LAQ_CanDo_ManuscriptBody4_zonderopmerkingen.docx Published 118KbMicrosoft WordView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science