Title: Comparison of criminal and administrative penalties for environmental offenses
Authors: Blondiau, Thomas ×
Billiet, Carole
Rousseau, Sandra #
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Kluwer Academic
Series Title: European Journal of Law and Economics vol:39 issue:1 pages:11-35
Abstract: We conduct a counterfactual analysis to measure the treatment difference between administrative and criminal enforcement of environmental violations. Our aim is to control for the selection bias effect and make a comparison of how similar offenses are treated in both enforcement tracks. This analysis is relevant to answer the question of how deterrence and welfare in a combined criminal-administrative enforcement system compare with an enforcement system relying on criminal penalization only. This is an important question given the observed shift towards two-track penalization systems, combining administrative and criminal penalization, for environmental enforcement in the European Union. We apply matching techniques on a unique dataset of environmental enforcement cases to control for sample selection bias. We match different enforcement cases, based on case characteristics and estimate the average treatment effect for these cases. Overall, we find that the marginal penalty is slightly lower in administrative enforcement compared to criminal enforcement.
ISSN: 0929-1261
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Research Centre for Economics and Corporate Sustainability, Campus Brussels
Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB) - miscellaneous
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
15_TB-CMB-SR_crim-admin-match-EJLE-final.pdf Published 466KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science