Title: Retrospective memory for breathlessness and pain
Authors: Walentynowicz, Marta
Van Diest, Ilse
Raes, Filip
Van den Bergh, Omer
Issue Date: Sep-2014
Conference: Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Advancement of Respiratory Psychophysiology (ISARP) location:New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA date:19-21 September 2014
Abstract: Background
Patient reports and questionnaire data on symptoms mostly rely on retrospective memory. Comparisons of concurrent (through experience sampling) and retrospective reports typically have no control over actual experiences. Also, individual differences in retrospective symptom reporting after experimental symptom inductions have not been systematically investigated. In the present study, we investigated retrospective memory for two experimentally induced symptoms, namely breathlessness and pain, in high (HSR) and low habitual symptom reporters (LSR).
Healthy women (N=48; 24HSR/24LSR) participated in (a) two trials of a rebreathing paradigm, leading to a gradual increase in PCO2, ventilation and breathlessness, and (b) two trials of a modified cold pressor task. Dyspnea and pain inductions were administered in two separate sessions and participants were counterbalanced across eight trial orders. Dyspnea and pain ratings were collected at four times: (1) continuously during symptom induction, (2) after each trial, (3) after the experiment, and (4) after 2 weeks. State NA and state anxiety were measured after every trial.
Dyspnea induction resulted in higher state NA and anxiety than pain induction. Retrospective evaluations were overall higher than concurrent evaluations, but differences between dyspnea and pain emerged. While retrospective dyspnea ratings were equally overestimated by both groups, the recalled pain ratings were higher in HSR than in LSR. Moreover, a further increase in overestimation over time was only found for breathlessness ratings in HSR.
Our results show that even though retrospective evaluations of both breathlessness and pain are distorted, the type of bias clearly differs between the symptoms. The findings suggest the relevance of unpleasantness of the experience for memory processes, such that in less aversive inductions individual differences play a more pronounced role. Moreover, the observed increase of dyspnea overestimation over time is important for diagnostic assessment based on symptom reporting.
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IMa
Appears in Collections:Health Psychology
Centre for Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
ISARP 2014 Walentynowicz Marta_poster.pdfWalentynowicz et al 2014 Retrospective memory for breathlessness and pain Published 602KbAdobe PDFView/Open
ISARP 2014 Walentynowicz Marta_memory_pain_dyspnea.pdfWalentynowicz et al 2014 Retrospective memory for breathlessness and pain abstract Published 7KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.