Download PDF (external access)

Dalton Transactions

Publication date: 2005-01-01
Pages: 2849 - 2858
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

Author:

Tsipis, AC
Orpen, AG ; Harvey, Jeremy N

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Physical Sciences, Chemistry, Inorganic & Nuclear, Chemistry, RING-CLOSING METATHESIS, N-HETEROCYCLIC CARBENES, OLEFIN METATHESIS, ELECTROSPRAY-IONIZATION, CROSS-METATHESIS, STRUCTURAL SYSTEMATICS, METAL-COMPLEXES, RUCL2(=CHR)(PR(3))(2), POLYMERIZATION, NORBORNENE, 0302 Inorganic Chemistry, 0307 Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, 0399 Other Chemical Sciences, Inorganic & Nuclear Chemistry, 3402 Inorganic chemistry

Abstract:

Density functional theory calculations are reported concerning the dissociative mechanism for alkene metathesis by ruthenium dichloride catalysts, including both bisphosphine and diaminocarbene/phosphine complexes. The calculations use a hierarchy of models, ranging from [(L)(PH(3))Ru(Cl)(2)(CH(2))](L=PH(3) or diaminocarbene) through the larger [(L)(PMe(3))Ru(Cl)(2)(CHPh)] to the "real"[(L)(PCy(3))Ru(Cl)(2)(CHPh)]. Calculations show that the rate-limiting step for metathesis is either ring closing from an alkene complex to form a ruthena-cyclobutane, or ring-opening of the latter intermediate to form an isomeric alkene complex. The higher efficiency of the diaminocarbene based catalysts is due to the stabilization of the formal +iv oxidation state of the ruthenium centre in the metallacycle. This effect is partly masked in the smaller model systems due to a previously unnoticed stereoelectronic effect. The calculations do not reproduce the experimental observation whereby the initiation step, phosphine dissociation, is more energetically demanding and hence slower for the diaminocarbene-containing catalyst system than for the bisphosphine. Further calculations on the corresponding bond energies using a variety of DFT and hybrid DFT/molecular mechanics methods all find instead a larger phosphine dissociation energy for the bisphosphine catalyst. This reversed order of binding energies would in fact be the one expected based on the stronger trans influence of the diaminocarbene ligand. The discrepancy with experiment is small and could have a number of causes which are discussed here.