ITEM METADATA RECORD
Title: Both predictability and familiarity facilitate contour integration
Authors: Sassi, MichaĆ«l
Demeyer, Maarten
Machilsen, Bart
Putzeys, Tom
Wagemans, Johan # ×
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Scholar One, Inc.
Series Title: Journal of Vision vol:14 issue:5 pages:1-15
Article number: 11
Abstract: Research has shown that contour detection is impaired in the visual periphery for snake-shaped Gabor contours but not for circular and elliptical contours. This discrepancy in findings could be due to differences in intrinsic shape
properties, including shape closure and curvature variation, as well as to differences in stimulus predictability and familiarity. In a detection task using only circular contours, the target shape is both more familiar and more predictable to the observer compared with a detection task in which a different snake-shaped contour is presented on each trial. In this study, we investigated the effects of stimulus familiarity and predictability on contour integration by manipulating and disentangling the familiarity and predictability of snakelike stimuli. We manipulated stimulus familiarity by extensively training observers with one particular snake shape. Predictability was varied by alternating trial blocks with only a single target shape and trial blocks with multiple target shapes. Our results show that both predictability and familiarity facilitated contour integration, which constitutes novel behavioral evidence for the adaptivity of the contour integration mechanism in humans. If familiarity or predictability facilitated contour integration in the periphery specifically, this could explain the discrepant findings obtained with snake contours as compared with circles or ellipses. However, we found that their facilitatory effects did not differ between central and peripheral vision and thus cannot explain that particular discrepancy in the literature.
ISSN: 1534-7362
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Laboratory for Experimental Psychology
Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Sassi_JoV_2014.pdfOA article Published 662KbAdobe PDFView/Open

 


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science