Title: Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays
Authors: Peumans, Marleen ×
Voet, Martine
De Munck, Jan
Van Landuyt, Kirsten
Van Ende, Annelies
Van Meerbeek, Bart #
Issue Date: Apr-2013
Publisher: Springer
Series Title: Clinical Oral Investigations vol:17 issue:3 pages:739-750
Article number: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9
Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of a self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), used for cementation of ceramic inlays. In addition, the influence of selectively acid-etching enamel prior to luting on the clinical performance of the restorations was assessed.
Methods: Sixty-two IPS Empress 2 inlays/onlays were placed in 31 patients by two experienced clinicians. The restorations were luted with RelyX Unicem with (=experimental group: E) or without (=control group: NE) prior enamel etching with phosphoric acid. At baseline, 6 months, 1, 2 and 4 years after placement, the restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS criteria. Ten selected samples of each group were investigated under SEM regarding morphological changes at the cement-inlay interface.
Results: The recall rate at 4 years was 97%. Two restorations (1 E, 1 NE) were lost, and one (E) had to be replaced due to inlay and tooth fracture resulting in a survival rate of 95%. No significant differences between the experimental and control group were noticed regarding all criteria (McNemar, p<0.05). An obvious deterioration in marginal integrity was observed after 4 years as only 5% (E=7%; NE=3%) of the restorations exhibited an excellent marginal adaptation. In 90% of the restorations small, still clinically acceptable marginal deficiencies were observed. SEM of the luting gap showed an increased wear of the RelyX Unicem cement over the 4-year period.
Conclusions: The self-adhesive luting cement RelyX Unicem can be recommended for bonding of ceramic inlays/onlays. Additional selective enamel etching does not improve the clinical performance of the restorations within the 4-year period.
ISSN: 1432-6981
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Biomaterials - BIOMAT
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Peumans - 2013 - 4 year clinical evaluation - Clin Oral Investig.pdf Published 725KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science