Title: The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint Method: Comparison with Other Methods, and Rationales for Key Requirements
Authors: Pelletier, Nathan ×
Allacker, Karen
Pant, Rana
Manfredi, Simone #
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Ecomed Publishers
Series Title: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment vol:19 pages:387-404
Abstract: Purpose
The European Commission (EC) has developed a reference method for organisation environmental footprinting (OEF) in support of improving the sustainability of production and consumption. This methodological development was guided by four core criteria. Specifically, it was deemed necessary that the method provides for a (1) multi-criteria,
(2) life cycle-based approach that considers all organisational and related activities across the supply chain, (3) provides for reproducibility and comparability over flexibility, and (4)ensures physically realistic modelling.
Here, we review a subset of existing organisation environmental footprinting methods. We evaluate key areas
of convergence (very limited!) and divergence between these
methods, and the extent to which the methodological specifications they provide satisfy the four aforementioned
criteria for the EC OEF method. On this basis, we specify
where and why the EC OEF method necessarily diverges
from and/or goes beyond the reviewed methods.
Results and discussion
We found little consistency between the reviewed methods, and few instances where our four criteria for the EC OEF method were satisfied. We specify the methodological norms for the EC OEF method for, among other things, definition of the unit of analysis (the organisation) and reference flow; organisation and analytical boundaries; cut-off criteria; impact categories and models; allocation solutions; and data quality. We further provide a rationale for each norm, in particular why they diverge from the various options presented in the reviewed methods.
In order to satisfy the four core criteria, the EC OEF method diverges from/goes beyond the reviewed methods in a variety of important respects. We suggest that the end result represents a significant advance in the standardization of life cycle-based organisation environmental footprinting.
ISSN: 0948-3349
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Non-KU Leuven Association publications
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Pelletier et al 2014.pdfOA article Published 394KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science