Author:

Keywords:

New genetics, Family work, Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Communication, The Netherlands, Genetic testing, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Qualitative Research, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Social Sciences, Biomedical, Biomedical Social Sciences, BREAST-CANCER, COMMUNICATION, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial, Family Relations, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 14 Economics, 16 Studies in Human Society, Public Health, 38 Economics, 42 Health sciences, 44 Human society

Abstract:

The literature shows that genetic testing could stimulate solidarity among family members, but also lead to major conflicts. To prevent negative effects, clinical geneticists and ethicists have stressed the importance of 'good communication' within families. In this qualitative study, we followed six extended families in the southern and eastern Netherlands involved in genetic testing for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for three and a half years. In total 57 members of these families were interviewed in depth, most more than once. Our analysis shows that genetic testing does affect families, but that families perform a lot of 'balancing work' in order to prevent genetic testing from becoming too all-encompassing. There is much more continuity in family life than is often thought. Moreover, as these families demonstrate different styles of family work, establishing a single norm of 'good communication' in clinical genetics might in fact be more harmful for family life than genetic testing itself.