Title: Correlating in vitro scratch test with in vivo contact free occlusal area wear of contemporary dental composites
Authors: Palaniappan, Senthamaraiselvi # ×
Celis, Jean-Pierre
Van Meerbeek, Bart
Peumans, Marleen
Lambrechts, Paul #
Issue Date: Mar-2013
Publisher: Munksgaard
Series Title: Dental Materials vol:29 issue:3 pages:259-268
Article number: 10.1016/
Abstract: Objectives
The aims of this study are to determine the extent to which the ranking order for clinical Contact-Free-Occlusal-Area (CFOA) wear performance of composites correlates with the ranking based on in vitro scratch hardness, and to analyze the extent to which the microstructure influences the overall trend.

Materials and methods
The patient data and CFOA wear measurements of 16 Tetric-C, 17 Tetric-EC, 16 Gradia-DP, 18 Filtek Supreme, 19 Z100 restorations in 31 subjects (8 males, 23 females) of two randomized clinical trials were fitted in a mixed-effect model. The in vivo performance of the restoratives was summarized by ranking the estimated material-related coefficients in the model. Scratch tests on two specimens per composite were run at a constant speed of 0.05 mm/s under indenter with normal loads of 15, 25, and 35 mN. Scratch width, depth and hardness calculated by imaging the scratch tracks were summarized in a model, the material-related coefficients were ranked and correlated with that of in vivo ranking order.

The best in vivo model included as significant factors (p < 0.0001) the variables material, time/month, cavity type, and jaw type. The CFOA wear ranking order – Filtek Supreme, Z100 > Tetric-C, Tetric-EC > Gradia-DP-correlated closely (R2 = 0.991) with the order of scratch hardness – Z100 > Filtek Supreme > Tetric-C, Tetric-EC > Gradia-DP.

Scratch tests could roughly categorize a new material as to whether it will probably exhibit a high or low in vitro scratch resistance and/or clinical CFOA wear rate.
ISSN: 0109-5641
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Surface and Interface Engineered Materials
Biomaterials - BIOMAT
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
pub06681.pdfMain article Published 3591KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science