Title: Effectiveness of soil conservation measures in two contrasting landscape units of South Eastern Tanzania
Authors: Kabanz, A.K.
Dondeyne, Stefaan ×
Kimaro, D.N.
Kafiriti, E.
Poesen, Jean
Deckers, Seppe #
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Gebrüder Borntraeger
Series Title: Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie vol:57 issue:3 pages:269-288
Article number: 0372-8854/13/0102
Abstract: RUSLE, the revised universal soil loss equation, is widely used for estimating potential soil erosion by water. Field measured model factors are however scarce for tropical
regions. We derived RUSLE factors for several soil conservation measures based on three seasons of field plot measurements (2008–2010), in two contrasting landscape units of South Eastern Tanzania, the country’s most important cashew growing area. Whereas the derived factors
are useful for applying RUSLE in similar environments, this study points to the importance of understanding differences between soil types and landscape units when assessing potential soil erosion. On the Makonde plateau, rainfall erosivity was higher than on the inland plains (7,130
vs 5,783 MJmmha–1 h–1 year–1). The soil erodility K factor was also higher (0.014 t h MJ–1mm–1) on the sandy Cutanic Acrisols of the Makonde plateau than on the clayey Acric Ferralsols (0.006 t h MJ–1mm–1) of the inland plains. Likewise, soil loss on the Makonde plateau was much higher than on the inland plain (e. g. for maize 33–127 t ha–1 season–1 vs 3–10 t ha–1 season–1). The differences between the C factor for “maize”, and for “maize with crop residues”, as well as the differences between the P factors for “lemon grass strips” and “ridges and furrows” indicate that although soils of the Makonde plateau are more susceptible to soil erosion, these soils are also more responsive to soil conservation measures compared to soils of the inland plains. Farmers’ local technique of making “ridges and furrows” is particularly effective.
Furthermore, the C factors for cashew groves are one order of magnitude lower (0.08–0.09) than for “maize”, or for “maize with crop residues” (0.2–0.7), but are still much higher than for “bush fallow” (0.001). Deforestation for agriculture hence bears the risk of increasing soil erosion rates; however, this risk can be minimised by growing cashew trees.
ISSN: 0372-8854
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Division Soil and Water Management
Division of Geography & Tourism
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Effectiveness of soil conservation measures in two contrasting landscape units.pdf Published 765KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science