Title: Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology
Authors: Cheebsumon, Patsuree ×
Boellaard, Ronald
De Ruysscher, Dirk
van Elmpt, Wouter
van Baardwijk, Angela
Yaqub, Maqsood
Hoekstra, Otto S
Comans, Emile Fi
Lammertsma, Adriaan A
van Velden, Floris Hp #
Issue Date: Oct-2012
Publisher: SpringerOpen
Series Title: EJNMMI Research vol:2 issue:1
Article number: 56
Abstract: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) may be useful for defining the gross tumour volume for radiation treatment planning and for response monitoring of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare tumour sizes obtained from CT- and various more commonly available PET-based tumour delineation methods to pathology findings. METHODS: Retrospective non-respiratory-gated whole body [18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT studies from 19 NSCLC patients were used. Several (semi-)automatic PET-based tumour delineation methods and manual CT-based delineation were used to assess the maximum tumour diameter. RESULTS: The PET-based 50 % and adaptive 41 % threshold-based delineation methods, and contrast-oriented delineation method showed good agreement with pathology after removing two outliers (R2 = 0.82). An absolute SUV threshold of 2.5 also showed a good agreement with pathology after the removal of five outliers (R2 = 0.79) but showed a significant overestimation in the maximum diameter (19.8 mm, p < 0.05). Adaptive 50 % threshold-based, relative threshold level and gradient-based methods did not show any outliers, provided only small, non-significant differences in maximum tumour diameter (<4.7 mm, p > 0.10) and showed fair correlation (R2 > 0.62) with pathology. Although the adaptive 70 % threshold-based method showed underestimation compared to pathology (36 %), it provided the best precision (SD = 14 %) together with good correlation (R2 = 0.81). Good correlation between CT delineation and pathology was observed (R2 = 0.77). However, CT delineation showed a significant overestimation compared with pathology (3.8 mm, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PET-based tumour delineation methods provided tumour sizes in agreement with pathology and may therefore be useful to define the (metabolically most) active part of the tumour for radiotherapy and monitoring purposes.
ISSN: 2191-219X
Publication status: accepted
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science