Download PDF

Journal of Neurophysiology

Publication date: 2012-09-01
Volume: 108 Pages: 1392 - 1402
Publisher: The Society

Author:

Premereur, Elsie
Vanduffel, Wim ; Roelfsema, P ; Janssen, Peter

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Neurosciences, Physiology, Neurosciences & Neurology, saccades, spatial attention, macaque, SELECTIVE VISUAL-ATTENTION, SPATIAL ATTENTION, PARIETAL CORTEX, ELECTRICAL MICROSTIMULATION, NEURAL MECHANISMS, NEURONAL-ACTIVITY, OCCIPITAL CORTEX, MACAQUE MONKEYS, TOP-DOWN, MODULATION, Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Biological Clocks, Brain Mapping, Brain Waves, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Neurology & Neurosurgery, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 42 Health sciences, 52 Psychology

Abstract:

Macaque frontal eye fields (FEF) and the lateral Intraparietal area (LIP) are high-level oculomotor control centers that have been implicated in the allocation of spatial attention. Electrical microstimulation of macaque FEF elicits functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activations in area LIP, but no study has yet investigated the effect of FEF microstimulation on LIP at the single-cell or local field potential (LFP) level. We recorded spiking and LFP activity in area LIP during weak, subthreshold microstimulation of the FEF in a delayed-saccade task. FEF microstimulation caused a highly time- and frequency-specific, task-dependent increase in gamma power in retinotopically corresponding sites in LIP: FEF microstimulation produced a significant increase in LIP gamma power when a saccade target appeared and remained present in the LIP receptive field (RF), whereas less specific increases in alpha power were evoked by FEF microstimulation for saccades directed away from the RF. Stimulating FEF with weak currents had no effect on LIP spike rates or on the gamma power during memory saccades or passive fixation. These results provide the first evidence for task-dependent modulations of LFPs in LIP caused by top-down stimulation of FEF. Since the allocation and disengagement of spatial attention in visual cortex have been associated with increases in gamma and alpha power, respectively, the effects of FEF microstimulation on LIP are consistent with the known effects of spatial attention.