Author:

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Technology, Engineering, Multidisciplinary, Engineering, Manufacturing, Engineering, epistemology, evaluation, user participation, philosophy of design, 0806 Information Systems, 1201 Architecture, 1203 Design Practice and Management, Design Practice & Management, 3301 Architecture, 3303 Design

Abstract:

Underlying the development of inclusive design approaches seems to be the assumption that inclusivity automatically leads to good design. What good design means, however, and how this relates to inclusivity, is not very clear. In this paper we try to shed light on these questions. In doing so, we provide an argument for conceiving design as a deliberative enterprise. We point out how inclusivity and normative objectivity can be reconciled, by defining the norm of good design in terms of a deliberative cooperation between designers and the people they design for. In this view, a design is inclusive when it is produced by exploiting the information and competences at the disposal of the designer and the people she designs for in qualified circumstances.