Title: The Right to be Forgotten - Worth Remembering?
Authors: Ausloos, Jef # ×
Issue Date: 23-Mar-2012
Series Title: Computer Law and Security Report vol:28 issue:2 pages:143-152
Article number: 5
Abstract: In the last few years there has been a lot of buzz around a so-called ‘right to be forgotten.’ Especially in Europe, this catchphrase is heavily debated in the media, in court and by regulators. Since a clear definition has not emerged (yet), the following article will try to raise the veil on this vague concept. The first part will weigh the right's pros and cons against each other. It will appear that the ‘right to be forgotten’ clearly has merit, but needs better definition to avoid any negative consequences. As such, the right is nothing more than a way to give (back) individuals control over their personal data and make the consent regime more effective. The second part will then evaluate the potential implementation of the right. Measures are required at the normative, economical, technical, as well as legislative level. The article concludes by proposing a ‘right to be forgotten’ that is limited to data-processing situations where the individual has given his or her consent. Combined with a public-interest exception, this should (partially) restore the power balance and allow individuals a more effective control over their personal data.
ISSN: 0267-3649
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Research Unit KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP)
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ - Worth remembering?.pdf Published 249KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science