Title: Some effort for some: Further evidence that scalar implicatures are effortful
Authors: Dieussaert, Kristien ×
Verkerk, Suzanne
Gillard, Ellen
Schaeken, Walter #
Issue Date: Dec-2011
Publisher: Psychology Press
Series Title: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology vol:64 issue:12 pages:2352-2367
Abstract: Under the assumption of the principle of cooperation (Grice, 1989), a statement such as “some eels are fish” is thought to be false since it contains less information than is considered sufficient. However, the statement is logically sound since the meaning of “some” is compatible with “all”. Currently, the primary interpretation of such underinformative statements remains subject to debate. According to Levinson (200027. Levinson , S. 2000 . Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalised conversational implicature , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .

View all references), the pragmatic “some but not all” interpretation is the default interpretation, while others (e.g., Sperber & Wilson, 1995) argue that this pragmatic interpretation only comes to the fore when relevant within the context and is thus considered secondary to the logical “some and perhaps all” interpretation. In this study, three factors that may influence the answer pattern are studied: task load, working memory capacity, and repetition of the statements. In Experiment 1, we used a secondary task paradigm to manipulate the cognitive load under which a number of underinformative statements had to be judged. We observed that for participants with a rather limited working memory span it is harder to reach a pragmatic interpretation under cognitive load. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the repetition of the statements. We observed that with a higher number of filler statements, participants produced fewer consistent answer patterns. This study provides further evidence against the automaticity of the pragmatic interpretation: It shows that the pragmatic interpretation requires more cognitive effort than the logical interpretation and that increasing the number of filler statements inhibits the development of a response strategy.
ISSN: 1747-0218
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Laboratory for Experimental Psychology
Algemene Diensten - UC Leuven
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
QJEP_2011_Scalar&effort.pdf Published 182KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science