Title: Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge
Authors: Murphy, Keelin ×
van Ginneken, Bram
Reinhardt, Joseph M
Kabus, Sven
Ding, Kai
Deng, Xiang
Cao, Kunlin
Du, Kaifang
Christensen, Gary E
Garcia, Vincent
Vercauteren, Tom
Ayache, Nicholas
Commowick, Olivier
Malandain, Gregoire
Glocker, Ben
Paragios, Nikos
Navab, Nassir
Gorbunova, Vladlena
Sporring, Jon
de Bruijne, Marleen
Han, Xiao
Heinrich, Mattias P
Schnabel, Julia A
Jenkinson, Mark
Lorenz, Cristian
Modat, Marc
McClelland, Jamie R
Ourselin, Sebastien
Muenzing, Sascha E. A
Viergever, Max A
De Nigris, Dante
Collins, D. Louis
Arbel, Tal
Peroni, Marta
Sharp, Gregory C
Schmidt-Richberg, Alexander
Ehrhardt, Jan
Werner, Rene
Smeets, Dirk
Loeckx, Dirk
Song, Gang
Tustison, Nicholas
Avants, Brian
Gee, James C
Staring, Marius
Klein, Stefan
Stoel, Berend C
Urschler, Martin
Werlberger, Manuel
Vandemeulebroucke, Jef
Rit, Simon
Sarrut, David
Pluim, Josien P. W #
Issue Date: Nov-2011
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Series Title: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging vol:30 issue:11 pages:1901-1920
Abstract: EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website ( The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.
Description: Murphy K., van Ginneken B., Reinhardt J.M., Kabus S., Ding K., Deng X., Cao K., Du K., Christensen G.E., Garcia V., Vercauteren T., Ayache N., Commowick O., Malandain G., Glocker B., Paragios N., Navab N., Gorbunova V., Sporring J., de Bruijne M., Han X., Heinrich M.P., Schnabel J.A., Jenkinson M., Lorenz C., Modat M., McClelland J.R., Ourselin S., Muenzing S.E.A., Viergever M.A., De Nigris D., Collins D.L., Arbel T., Peroni M., Li R., Sharp G.C., Schmidt-Richberg A., Ehrhardt J., Werner R., Smeets D., Loeckx D., Song G., Tustison N., Avants B., Gee J.C., Staring M., Klein S., Stoel B.C., Urschler M., Werlberger M., Vandemeulebroucke J., Rit S., Sarrut D., Pluim J.P.W., ''Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge'', IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1901-1920, November 2011.
ISSN: 0278-0062
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:ESAT - PSI, Processing Speech and Images
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
3250.pdf Published 1839KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science