Download PDF

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Publication date: 2010-01-01
Volume: 10
Publisher: BioMed Central

Author:

Baechni, C
Meier, S ; Spreiter, P ; Schild, U ; Regez, K ; Bossart, R ; Thomann, R ; Falconnier, C ; Christ-Crain, M ; De Geest, Sabina ; Müller, B ; Schuetz, P for the ProHosp study group

Keywords:

Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Respiratory System, COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, LOW-RISK PATIENTS, ANTIBIOTIC USE, PROCALCITONIN-GUIDANCE, CONTROLLED-TRIAL, GUIDELINES, HOSPITALIZATION, MANAGEMENT, THERAPY, CARE, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Family, Female, Health Care Surveys, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Physicians, Pneumonia, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Tract Infections, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, ProHOSP Study Group, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations for outpatient management, low risk patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are often hospitalized. This survey analyzed perceptions of physicians, nurses, patients and relatives about feasibility of outpatient management and required duration of hospital stay. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational questionnaire survey in hospitalized patients with LRTI as part of a multicenter trial. Treating physicians and nurses, patients and their relatives were asked on admission and before discharge about feasibility of outpatient treatment over 5 dimensions (medical, nursing, organizational factors, and patients' and relatives' preferences) using continuous scales. RESULTS: On admission, 12.6% of physicians, 15.1% of nurses, 18.0% of patients and 5.2% of relatives believed that outpatient treatment would be possible. Before hospital discharge, 31.1% of physicians, 32.2% of nurses, 11.6% of patients and 4.1% of relatives thought that earlier discharge would have been feasible. Medical factors were the most frequently perceived motives for inpatient management. These perceptions were similar in all LRTI subgroups and independent of disease severity and associated expected mortality risks as assessed by the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). CONCLUSION: Independent of type and severity of respiratory tract infection, the misperceived high severity and expected mortality and morbidity were the predominant reasons why treating physicians, nurses, patients and their relatives unanimously believed that inpatient management was necessary. Better assessment and communication about true expected medical risks might contribute to a pathway to shorten in-hospital days and to introduce a more risk-targeted and individually tailored allocation of health-care resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00350987.