Title: GAVeCeLT* consensus statement on the correct use of totally implantable venous access devices for diagnostic radiology procedures
Authors: Bonciarelli, Giorgio
Batacchi, Stefano
Biffi, Roberto
Buononato, Massimo
Damascelli, Bruno
Ghibaudo, Flavio
Orsi, Franco
Pittiruti, Mauro
Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo
Verzè, Alessia
Borasi, Guido
De Cicco, Marcello
Dosio, Roberto
Gazzo, Paolo
Maso, Renzo
Roman, Alessandro
Ticha, Vladimira
Venier, Giacomo
Blackburn, Paul
Goossens, Godelieve
Bowen Santolucito, Jamie
Stas, Marguerite
Van Boxtel, Ton
Vesely, Thomas M
de Lutio, Enrico # ×
Issue Date: Apr-2011
Publisher: Wichtig Editore
Series Title: Journal of Vascular Access
Article number: 2D373B21-4094-43D8-B390-068E7272C660
Abstract: The use of totally implantable venous access devices in radiology may be associated with complications such as occlusion of the system (because of the high density of some contrast), infection (if the port is not handled in aseptic conditions, using proper barrier protections), and mechanical complications due to the high-pressure administration of contrast by automatic injectors (so-called power injector), including extravasation of contrast media into the soft tissues, subintimal venous or myocardial injection, or serious damage to the device itself (breakage of the external connections, dislocation of the non-coring needle, or breakage of the catheter). The last problem - i.e., the damage of the device from a power injection - is not an unjustified fear, but a reality. A warning by the US Food and Drug Administration of July 2004 reports around 250 complications of this kind, referring to both port and central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheter systems, which occurred over a period of several years; in all cases, the damage occurred during the injection of contrast material by means of power injectors for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Though the risk associated with the use of ports in radiodiagnostics is thus clear, it has been suggested that administration of the contrast material via the port may have some advantage in terms of image quality, increased comfort for the patient, and maybe more accurate reproducibility of the patient's own follow-up exams. This contention needs to be supported by evidence. Also, since many cancer patients who need frequent computed tomography studies already have totally implantable systems, it would seem reasonable to try to define how and when such systems may safely be used. The purpose of this consensus statement is to define recommendations based on the best available evidence, for the safe use of implantable ports in radiodiagnostics.
ISSN: 1129-7298
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery
Surgical Oncology
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science