Title: Is it content or style? An evaluation of two competitive measurement models applied to a balanced set of ethnocentrism items
Authors: Cambré, Bart ×
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, Jerry
Billiet, Jaak #
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: Karnatak University
Series Title: International Journal of Comparative Sociology vol:43 issue:1 pages:1-20
Abstract: Attitude surveys often use sets of items with identical response scales (e.g., in Likert format) in order to formulate attitude constructs. There is considerable evidence that such a response format can be susceptible to acquiescence bias (i.e., the tendency to agree with survey questions). The specification of a style factor (acquiescence) in measurement models can result in well-fitted factorial invariant models for cross-cultural surveys. Attempts to model acquiescence are confronted with the phenomenon that models with a positive and a negative factor appear to be as likely as models with a bipolar factor and a style factor. We will evaluate the two competitive measurement models, applied to a balanced set of ethnocentrism items from the 1999 Religious and Moral Pluralism (RAMP) dataset. It is argued that the competing measurement models should be evaluated in the context of a theoretically meaningful nomological network.
ISSN: 0020-7152
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Centre for Sociological Research
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
2002 - Is it Content or Style.pdf Published 183KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science