Title: Does B-mode common carotid artery intima-media thickness differ from M-mode?
Authors: Van Bortel, LM ×
Vanmolkot, FH
van der Heijden-Spek, JJ
Bregu, M
Staessen, Jan A
Hoeks, AP #
Issue Date: Oct-2001
Publisher: Elsevier science inc
Series Title: Ultrasound in medicine and biology vol:27 issue:10 pages:1333-1336
Abstract: An Increased intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery Is thought to be an early sign of atherosclerosis. Both B- and M-mode ultrasonographic techniques are used to measure the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (B-IMT and M-IMT, respectively). The present study compares intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery measured with the two techniques. Intima-media thickness was measured in a random population sample of 250 subjects. Comparison was made by mean and 95% confidence intervals of differences between B-IMT and M-IMT, by linear regression analysis, and by intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients. M-IMT was + 0.011 +/- 0.091 mm (95% confidence intervals: -0.167 to + 0.188 mm) larger than B-IMT, which was 0.661 +/- 0.136 rum (range: 0.380 to 1.120 mm). Intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients were 0.802 and 0.801, respectively. In conclusion, acceptable agreement exists between the two methods and there was no important systematic difference between B-IMT and M-IMT. (C) 2001 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
ISSN: 0301-5629
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
01-39-P.pdf Published 52KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science