Title: Long-term effect of feedback and peer comparison on the sampling quality of cervical smears--a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Buntinx, Frank ×
Knottnerus, J A
Essed, G G
Crebolder, H F #
Issue Date: Apr-1995
Series Title: European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) vol:4 issue:2 pages:153-7
Abstract: In a randomized controlled trial the effect of feedback and peer review directed at the sample-taking doctor (n = 179) on the sampling quality of cervical smears (n = 21,240) was studied. This paper reports the impact 6 and 12 months after the end of the intervention. Monthly feedback with peer comparison was related to a net improvement in the proportion of cervical smears without endocervical cells during the intervention period, as well as during a follow-up period lasting until 15 months after the end of the intervention. This improvement seemed to be related to a minimum of 50 or even 100 smears performed each year and was therefore not confirmed on clustered data analysis. There is a strong suggestion that the intervention also related to an increase of the number of smears showing cytological pathology, although this study lacked sufficient power to test this hypothesis.
ISSN: 0959-8278
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Academic Center for General Practice
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science