ITEM METADATA RECORD
Title: Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Authors: Emanuel, Ezekiel J ×
Lemmens, Trudo
Elliot, Carl #
Issue Date: Jul-2006
Publisher: Public library science
Series Title: Plos medicine vol:3 issue:7 pages:941-944
Article number: e309
Abstract: BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE: An important mechanism for protecting human research participants is the prior approval of a clinical study by a research ethics board, known in the United States as an institutional review board (IRB). Traditionally, IRBs have been run by volunteer committees of scientists and clinicians working in the academic medical centers where the studies they review are being carried out. However, for-profit organizations are increasingly being hired to conduct ethics reviews. Proponents of for-profit IRBs argue that these IRBs are just as capable as academic IRBs at providing high-quality ethics reviews. Critics argue that for-profit IRBs have a conflict of interest because they generate their income from clients who have a direct financial interest in obtaining approval.
URI: 
ISSN: 1549-1676
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Interfaculty Centre for Biomedial Ethics and Law
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy

 




All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science