Title: An inventory of peer assessment diversity
Authors: Gielen, Sarah ×
Dochy, Filip
Onghena, Patrick #
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Routledge
Series Title: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education vol:36 issue:2 pages:137-155
Abstract: Since Topping published his literature review on peer assessment in 1998, the number of studies on this subject has doubled, if not tripled. However, along with this expansion, the diversity of peer assessment applications increased equally fast. Based on recent literature, this contribution focuses specifically on the diversity that has come to exist in order to update Topping’s typology, adding eight variables, extending eight others with extra sub-dimensions, and including the implementation factors. Five original variables were absorbed into larger entities, leaving 20 variables which were finally grouped into five clusters. For teachers or advisors, this inventory may be of interest as a source of inspiration or as a checklist of important decisions to make when working with peer evaluation. For researchers, it may be a guide towards covering the full scope of particularities when introducing their peer assessment design. Moreover, the framework developed in this paper might relieve the possible confusion originating from the use of a single term to cover a multitude of sometimes incompatible practices.
ISSN: 0260-2938
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Methodology of Educational Sciences
Education and Training
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Gielen, Dochy & Onghena 2010.pdfMain article Published 117KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science