Title: Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated
Authors: Van Den Bruel, Ann ×
Aertgeerts, Bert
Buntinx, Frank #
Issue Date: Jun-2006
Series Title: Journal of clinical epidemiology vol:59 issue:6 pages:559-66
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random error, using the original data of a diagnostic accuracy study. External validation requires a new study in an independent but similar population. Here we describe whether diagnostic research is validated, which technique is used, and to what extent the validation study results differ from the original. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: All original diagnostic accuracy studies published in 1993 in a predefined set of journals were selected. Validation of these studies was assessed in the original article and in articles published within a period of 10 years, through a literature search and contacting the authors. RESULTS: None of the original studies reported any form of validation. Validation studies published later could be identified for 7 of the 11 original studies. Test characteristics were difficult to compare. Despite what was generally believed, not every validation study showed results inferior to the original. We found more studies that evaluated the test in a different population than in a similar one. CONCLUSION: Not every diagnostic accuracy study is validated. Diagnostic tests are more often repeated in different populations.
ISSN: 0895-4356
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Academic Center for General Practice
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
2006AVdBdiagnJCE.pdf Published 166KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science