Title: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire
Authors: Claerhout, Filip ×
Moons, Philip
Ghesquiere, Sophie
Verguts, Jasper
De Ridder, Dirk
Deprest, Jan #
Issue Date: May-2010
Series Title: International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction vol:21 issue:5 pages:569-578
Abstract: INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to test validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of a prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL). METHODS: P-QoL was translated into Dutch and adjusted by a panel of five experts. The scores of the final version were compared between symptomatic (n = 160) and asymptomatic (n = 80) patients and with findings on vaginal examination (pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q)). In terms of reliability, Cronbach's alpha was calculated, and a test-retest (n = 20) was performed. Responsiveness to treatment was assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative scores in 45 patients. RESULTS: Total scores for each P-QoL domain were different between symptomatic and asymptomatic women (p < 0.001). Severity according to P-QoL correlated well with POP-Q findings. Cronbach's alphas showed internal consistency within the domains. Test-retest reliability was high. Pre- and postoperative scores for each domain were significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of P-QoL is valid, reliable and responsive to assess quality-of-life and symptoms in Dutch-speaking patients with urogenital prolapse.
ISSN: 0937-3462
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Claerhout 2010 vol21 pp569-578.pdf Published 228KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science