Title: Rating of statements in an internal course evaluation: comparison between different groups of assessors
Authors: Elen, Jan ×
Naert, Ignace
Lambrechts, Paul
Garmyn, Peter
Verdonck, Anna
Van der Plaetsen, Ibe
Goijens, Kris
Quirynen, Marc #
Issue Date: May-2002
Publisher: Munksgaard
Series Title: European Journal of Dental Education vol:6 issue:2 pages:64-8
Abstract: The increased concern for accountability and quality improvement is inducing universities throughout Europe to evaluate and control performance. The establishment of criteria for educational quality, a requirement for a successful evaluation, was studied as part of an evaluation of the dental education programme at the Catholic University of Leuven. Criteria suggested by different groups (members of the internal evaluation commission including graduate and postgraduate students; members of the academic staff of the School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, and other members of the academic staff, not directly belonging to the school), were analysed by means of ANOVA with Scheffé posthoc tests to identify intergroup differences. It was hypothesized that a closer connection to the dental curriculum or a higher responsibility in the evaluation process would result in stricter criteria. For 108 different questions (in the form of statements with a six point Likert-type scale), members of the three groups had to indicate the score below which the quality would be considered suboptimal. Except for one question, no significant differences were found between ratings given by the members of the internal evaluation commission and other members of the School. Significant differences were found between non-school members and school- and/or commission-members. This study indicates that agreement on educational quality may be presupposed within an academic faculty and between members of the internal evaluation commission. However, the study also indicated that some caution should be exercised when 'external' teachers are included in the evaluation process.
ISSN: 1396-5883
VABB publication type: VABB-1
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Prosthetics
Biomaterials - BIOMAT
Education and Training
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
2002_EurJDentEduc_Elen_Rating of statements in an internal course evaluation - comparison between different groups of assessors.pdf Published 103KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.